Saturday, March 3, 2012
Shame on Indian Cricket selectors
Shame on Indian Cricket selectors. They have been appointed to select the team which will represent India in Asia Cup,not a Dhoni led Chennai Super Kings team.On what basis Suresh Raina is in and Virendra Sehwag is out. Dhoni is killing all his competetiors, he has done it with Sourav Ganguly, Anil Kumble, Rahul Dravid, VVS Laxman,Amit Mishra,Harbhajan Singh and now Zaheer Khan and Virendra Sehwag. Very soon you will find Gautam Gambhir dropped from the team and then finally SRT?????. Let's stop this immediately Sachin is Almighty and he should remain there with full grace and pride.
Wednesday, February 29, 2012
Team India Selection for Asia Cup
Shame on Indian Cricket selectors. They have been appointed to select the team which will represent India in Asia Cup,not a Dhoni led Chennai Super Kings team.On what basis Suresh Raina is in and Virendra Sehwag is out. Dhoni is killing all his competetiors, he has done it with Sourav Ganguly, Anil Kumble, Rahul Dravid, VVS Laxman,Amit Mishra,Harbhajan Singh and now Zaheer Khan and Virendra Sehwag. Very soon you will find Gautam Gambhir dropped from the team and then finally SRT?????. Let's stop this immediately Sachin is Almighty and he should there with full grace and pride.
Monday, October 10, 2011
Jagjit Singh
It is hard to believe that Jagjit Singh Ji is no more with us. I met him three times in the last ten years, the last one was in the year 2005 when Sanjay Kaul and I met him in a five star hotel in Delhi(The Lalit). We three had a great time there. Six years have passed but that meeting with the Mastereo is still fresh in my memories. Sir we will miss you badly. Aah ko chaheiye ek umar asar hone tak, Kaun jeeta hai teri zulf ke sar hone tak. RIP Jagjit Singh Ji.
Saturday, August 27, 2011
Nitin Dakshene experiencing Indian Institute of Technology Delhi(IIT-Delhi)
Its a great feeling and honour to be associated with the Indian Institute of Technology Delhi(IIT-Delhi). Currently pursuing a short term course on Supply Chain Management from IIT Delhi.
Friday, August 26, 2011
If GOD created the Universe than who created the GOD
Number of sceptics asks me this question. But God by definition is the uncreated creator of the universe, so the question ‘Who created God?’ is illogical, just like ‘To whom is the bachelor married?’
So a more sophisticated questioner might ask: ‘If the universe needs a cause, then why doesn’t God need a cause? And if God doesn’t need a cause, why should the universe need a cause?’ In reply, Christians should use the following reasoning:
Everything which has a beginning has a cause.1
The universe has a beginning.
Therefore the universe has a cause.
It’s important to stress the words in bold type. The universe requires a cause because it had a beginning, as will be shown below. God, unlike the universe, had no beginning, so doesn’t need a cause. In addition, Einstein’s general relativity, which has much experimental support, shows that time is linked to matter and space. So time itself would have begun along with matter and space. Since God, by definition, is the creator of the whole universe, he is the creator of time. Therefore He is not limited by the time dimension He created, so has no beginning in time—God is ‘the high and lofty One that inhabiteth eternity’ (Is. 57:15). Therefore He doesn’t have a cause.
In contrast, there is good evidence that the universe had a beginning. This can be shown from the Laws of Thermodynamics, the most fundamental laws of the physical sciences.
1st Law: The total amount of mass-energy in the universe is constant.
2nd Law: The amount of energy available for work is running out, or entropy is increasing to a maximum.
If the total amount of mass-energy is limited, and the amount of usable energy is decreasing, then the universe cannot have existed forever, otherwise it would already have exhausted all usable energy—the ‘heat death’ of the universe. For example, all radioactive atoms would have decayed, every part of the universe would be the same temperature, and no further work would be possible. So the obvious corollary is that the universe began a finite time ago with a lot of usable energy, and is now running down.
Now, what if the questioner accepts that the universe had a beginning, but not that it needs a cause? But it is self-evident that things that begin have a cause—no-one really denies it in his heart. All science and history would collapse if this law of cause and effect were denied. So would all law enforcement, if the police didn’t think they needed to find a cause for a stabbed body or a burgled house. Also, the universe cannot be self-caused—nothing can create itself, because that would mean that it existed before it came into existence, which is a logical absurdity.
In Summary
· The universe (including time itself) can be shown to have had a beginning.
· It is unreasonable to believe something could begin to exist without a cause.
· The universe therefore requires a cause, just as Genesis 1:1 and Romans 1:20 teach.
· God, as creator of time, is outside of time. Since therefore He has no beginning in time, He has always existed, so doesn’t need a cause.
Objections
There are only two ways to refute an argument:
a. Show that it is logically invalid
b. Show that at least one of the premises is false.
a) Is the argument valid?
A valid argument is one where it is impossible for the premises to be true and the conclusion false. Note that validity does not depend on the truth of the premises, but on the form of the argument. The argument in this paper is valid; it is of the same form as: All whales have backbones; Moby Dick is a whale; therefore Moby Dick has a backbone. So the only hope for the sceptic is to dispute one or both of the premises.
b) Are the premises true?
1) Does the universe have a beginning?
Oscillating universe ideas were popularized by atheists like the late Carl Sagan and Isaac Asimov solely to avoid the notion of a beginning, with its implications of a Creator. But as shown above, the Laws of Thermodynamics undercut that argument. Even an oscillating universe cannot overcome those laws. Each one of the hypothetical cycles would exhaust more and more usable energy. This means every cycle would be larger and longer than the previous one, so looking back in time there would be smaller and smaller cycles. So the multicycle model could have an infinite future, but can only have a finite past.2
Also, there are many lines of evidence showing that there is far too little mass for gravity to stop expansion and allow cycling in the first place, i.e., the universe is ‘open’. According to the best estimates (even granting old-earth assumptions), the universe still has only about half the mass needed for re-contraction. This includes the combined total of both luminous matter and non-luminous matter (found in galactic halos), as well as any possible contribution of neutrinos to total mass.3 Some recent evidence for an ‘open’ universe comes from the number of light-bending ‘gravitational lenses’ in the sky.4 Also, analysis of Type Ia supernovae shows that the universe’s expansion rate is not slowing enough for a closed universe5,6 It seems like there is only 40-80% of the required matter to cause a ‘big crunch’. Incidentally, this low mass is also a major problem for the currently fashionable ‘inflationary’ version of the ‘big bang’ theory, as this predicts a mass density just on the threshold of collapse—a ‘flat’ universe.
Finally, no known mechanism would allow a bounce back after a hypothetical ‘big crunch’.7 As the late Professor Beatrice Tinsley of Yale explained, even though the mathematics says that the universe oscillates, ‘There is no known physical mechanism to reverse a catastrophic big crunch.’ Off the paper and into the real world of physics, those models start from the Big Bang, expand, collapse, and that’s the end.8
2) Denial of cause and effect
Some physicists assert that quantum mechanics violates this cause/effect principle and can produce something from nothing. For instance, Paul Davies writes:
… spacetime could appear out of nothingness as a result of a quantum transition. … Particles can appear out of nowhere without specific causation … Yet the world of quantum mechanics routinely produces something out of nothing.9
But this is a gross misapplication of quantum mechanics. Quantum mechanics never produces something out of nothing. Davies himself admitted on the previous page that his scenario ‘should not be taken too seriously.’
Theories that the universe is a quantum fluctuation must presuppose that there was something to fluctuate—their ‘quantum vacuum’ is a lot of matter-antimatter potential—not ‘nothing’. Also, I have plenty of theoretical and practical experience at quantum mechanics (QM) from my doctoral thesis work. For example, Raman spectroscopy is a QM phenomenon, but from the wavenumber and intensity of the spectral bands, we can work out the masses of the atoms and force constants of the bonds causing the bands. To help the atheist position that the universe came into existence without a cause, one would need to find Raman bands appearing without being caused by transitions in vibrational quantum states, or alpha particles appearing without pre-existing nuclei, etc. If QM was as acausal as some people think, then we should not assume that these phenomena have a cause. Then I may as well burn my Ph.D. thesis, and all the spectroscopy journals should quit, as should any nuclear physics research.
Also, if there is no cause, there is no explanation why this particular universe appeared at a particular time, nor why it was a universe and not, say, a banana or cat which appeared. This universe can’t have any properties to explain its preferential coming into existence, because it wouldn’t have any properties until it actually came into existence.
Is creation by God rational?
A last desperate tactic by sceptics to avoid a theistic conclusion is to assert that creation in time is incoherent. Davies correctly points out that since time itself began with the beginning of the universe, it is meaningless to talk about what happened ‘before’ the universe began. But he claims that causes must precede their effects. So if nothing happened ‘before’ the universe began, then (according to Davies) it is meaningless to discuss the cause of the universe’s beginning.
But the philosopher (and New Testament scholar) William Lane Craig, in a useful critique of Davies,10 pointed out that Davies is deficient in philosophical knowledge. Philosophers have long discussed the notion of simultaneous causation. Immanuel Kant (1724–1804) gave the example of a weight resting on a cushion simultaneously causing a depression in it. Craig says: The first moment of time is the moment of God’s creative act and of creation’s simultaneous coming to be.
Some skeptics claim that all this analysis is tentative, because that is the nature of science. So this can’t be used to prove creation by God. Of course, sceptics can’t have it both ways: saying that the Bible is wrong because science has proved it so, but if science appears consistent with the Bible, then well, science is tentative anyway
Regards
Nitin Dakshene
So a more sophisticated questioner might ask: ‘If the universe needs a cause, then why doesn’t God need a cause? And if God doesn’t need a cause, why should the universe need a cause?’ In reply, Christians should use the following reasoning:
Everything which has a beginning has a cause.1
The universe has a beginning.
Therefore the universe has a cause.
It’s important to stress the words in bold type. The universe requires a cause because it had a beginning, as will be shown below. God, unlike the universe, had no beginning, so doesn’t need a cause. In addition, Einstein’s general relativity, which has much experimental support, shows that time is linked to matter and space. So time itself would have begun along with matter and space. Since God, by definition, is the creator of the whole universe, he is the creator of time. Therefore He is not limited by the time dimension He created, so has no beginning in time—God is ‘the high and lofty One that inhabiteth eternity’ (Is. 57:15). Therefore He doesn’t have a cause.
In contrast, there is good evidence that the universe had a beginning. This can be shown from the Laws of Thermodynamics, the most fundamental laws of the physical sciences.
1st Law: The total amount of mass-energy in the universe is constant.
2nd Law: The amount of energy available for work is running out, or entropy is increasing to a maximum.
If the total amount of mass-energy is limited, and the amount of usable energy is decreasing, then the universe cannot have existed forever, otherwise it would already have exhausted all usable energy—the ‘heat death’ of the universe. For example, all radioactive atoms would have decayed, every part of the universe would be the same temperature, and no further work would be possible. So the obvious corollary is that the universe began a finite time ago with a lot of usable energy, and is now running down.
Now, what if the questioner accepts that the universe had a beginning, but not that it needs a cause? But it is self-evident that things that begin have a cause—no-one really denies it in his heart. All science and history would collapse if this law of cause and effect were denied. So would all law enforcement, if the police didn’t think they needed to find a cause for a stabbed body or a burgled house. Also, the universe cannot be self-caused—nothing can create itself, because that would mean that it existed before it came into existence, which is a logical absurdity.
In Summary
· The universe (including time itself) can be shown to have had a beginning.
· It is unreasonable to believe something could begin to exist without a cause.
· The universe therefore requires a cause, just as Genesis 1:1 and Romans 1:20 teach.
· God, as creator of time, is outside of time. Since therefore He has no beginning in time, He has always existed, so doesn’t need a cause.
Objections
There are only two ways to refute an argument:
a. Show that it is logically invalid
b. Show that at least one of the premises is false.
a) Is the argument valid?
A valid argument is one where it is impossible for the premises to be true and the conclusion false. Note that validity does not depend on the truth of the premises, but on the form of the argument. The argument in this paper is valid; it is of the same form as: All whales have backbones; Moby Dick is a whale; therefore Moby Dick has a backbone. So the only hope for the sceptic is to dispute one or both of the premises.
b) Are the premises true?
1) Does the universe have a beginning?
Oscillating universe ideas were popularized by atheists like the late Carl Sagan and Isaac Asimov solely to avoid the notion of a beginning, with its implications of a Creator. But as shown above, the Laws of Thermodynamics undercut that argument. Even an oscillating universe cannot overcome those laws. Each one of the hypothetical cycles would exhaust more and more usable energy. This means every cycle would be larger and longer than the previous one, so looking back in time there would be smaller and smaller cycles. So the multicycle model could have an infinite future, but can only have a finite past.2
Also, there are many lines of evidence showing that there is far too little mass for gravity to stop expansion and allow cycling in the first place, i.e., the universe is ‘open’. According to the best estimates (even granting old-earth assumptions), the universe still has only about half the mass needed for re-contraction. This includes the combined total of both luminous matter and non-luminous matter (found in galactic halos), as well as any possible contribution of neutrinos to total mass.3 Some recent evidence for an ‘open’ universe comes from the number of light-bending ‘gravitational lenses’ in the sky.4 Also, analysis of Type Ia supernovae shows that the universe’s expansion rate is not slowing enough for a closed universe5,6 It seems like there is only 40-80% of the required matter to cause a ‘big crunch’. Incidentally, this low mass is also a major problem for the currently fashionable ‘inflationary’ version of the ‘big bang’ theory, as this predicts a mass density just on the threshold of collapse—a ‘flat’ universe.
Finally, no known mechanism would allow a bounce back after a hypothetical ‘big crunch’.7 As the late Professor Beatrice Tinsley of Yale explained, even though the mathematics says that the universe oscillates, ‘There is no known physical mechanism to reverse a catastrophic big crunch.’ Off the paper and into the real world of physics, those models start from the Big Bang, expand, collapse, and that’s the end.8
2) Denial of cause and effect
Some physicists assert that quantum mechanics violates this cause/effect principle and can produce something from nothing. For instance, Paul Davies writes:
… spacetime could appear out of nothingness as a result of a quantum transition. … Particles can appear out of nowhere without specific causation … Yet the world of quantum mechanics routinely produces something out of nothing.9
But this is a gross misapplication of quantum mechanics. Quantum mechanics never produces something out of nothing. Davies himself admitted on the previous page that his scenario ‘should not be taken too seriously.’
Theories that the universe is a quantum fluctuation must presuppose that there was something to fluctuate—their ‘quantum vacuum’ is a lot of matter-antimatter potential—not ‘nothing’. Also, I have plenty of theoretical and practical experience at quantum mechanics (QM) from my doctoral thesis work. For example, Raman spectroscopy is a QM phenomenon, but from the wavenumber and intensity of the spectral bands, we can work out the masses of the atoms and force constants of the bonds causing the bands. To help the atheist position that the universe came into existence without a cause, one would need to find Raman bands appearing without being caused by transitions in vibrational quantum states, or alpha particles appearing without pre-existing nuclei, etc. If QM was as acausal as some people think, then we should not assume that these phenomena have a cause. Then I may as well burn my Ph.D. thesis, and all the spectroscopy journals should quit, as should any nuclear physics research.
Also, if there is no cause, there is no explanation why this particular universe appeared at a particular time, nor why it was a universe and not, say, a banana or cat which appeared. This universe can’t have any properties to explain its preferential coming into existence, because it wouldn’t have any properties until it actually came into existence.
Is creation by God rational?
A last desperate tactic by sceptics to avoid a theistic conclusion is to assert that creation in time is incoherent. Davies correctly points out that since time itself began with the beginning of the universe, it is meaningless to talk about what happened ‘before’ the universe began. But he claims that causes must precede their effects. So if nothing happened ‘before’ the universe began, then (according to Davies) it is meaningless to discuss the cause of the universe’s beginning.
But the philosopher (and New Testament scholar) William Lane Craig, in a useful critique of Davies,10 pointed out that Davies is deficient in philosophical knowledge. Philosophers have long discussed the notion of simultaneous causation. Immanuel Kant (1724–1804) gave the example of a weight resting on a cushion simultaneously causing a depression in it. Craig says: The first moment of time is the moment of God’s creative act and of creation’s simultaneous coming to be.
Some skeptics claim that all this analysis is tentative, because that is the nature of science. So this can’t be used to prove creation by God. Of course, sceptics can’t have it both ways: saying that the Bible is wrong because science has proved it so, but if science appears consistent with the Bible, then well, science is tentative anyway
Regards
Nitin Dakshene
Science Explained By Lord Krishna
Since the time Newton attempted to explain planetary orbits through the laws of gravity and Motion, the scientific belief that the totality of existence can be explained through science has been gaining momentum. Correspondingly the hand of God on the canvas of the universe has been becoming dimmer and dimmer. Prior to Newton, God was understood to be the creator and controller of the universe. Newtonian physics relegated Him to the role of a creator, a mere clockmaker who had no power over nature, which was governed by laws. Darwin’s origin of natural species proposed in 1859 provided the intellectual justification for removing God even from the role of the creator. The intellectual climate of that time embraced Darwinian evolution not so much because of its scientific basis, but because of its ideological implications. This covert agenda to exile God from the academic world was made explicit by Frederic Nietzsche through his jolting “God is dead” proclamation. Today almost all the academic textbooks and journals as well as commercial science fiction novels and movies portray evolution as a proven fact, as an unquestionable scientific reality. Time and time again we get to hear recycled versions of the same old tale of human and universal origins: the universe originated with a big bang, unicellular life evolved fortuitously on the earth in a primordial soup, life forms evolved to increasing levels of complexity, and gradually all the flora and fauna on our planet – including we humans – came about. And concomitantly the religious world reviews of universal origins involving God are almost instantly rejected as pre-scientific superstitions.
This materialistic worldview has gained widespread acceptance not so much due to its scientific validation as due to its vigorous propagation. Moreover the impressive technological accomplishments of science – catering to the mass demands for instant relief and pleasure – have created among people a naïve, unquestioning faith that whatever science says must be true.
But as the harmful effects of technology are being increasingly recognized, so also are the fallacies of the scientific worldview that underlies these technologies.
More and more people – including acclaimed scientists – are realizing that reductionistic theories overlook a cardinal principle of science: theories should be based on objective evidences, no matter how unexpected, and not subjective beliefs, no matter how popular. The evidence uncovered by science – both at the macroscopic and the microscopic level – portrays a picture of the universe that is strikingly different from what most of us have been taught to believe as science.
Observation of the fine harmony of the universal laws, the amazing complexity and the purposeful, wonderful organization of animate and inanimate life on different levels, has started a progressively strengthening movement for the respiritualization of science.
This website is not anti-science, it is pro-humanity. Our human race deserves to know the truths about its origin and purpose and that is what this site will provide –by combining modern scientific research with timeless Vedic wisdom. The value and glory of Vedic wisdom has been recognized by many eminent thinkers. We give here just a few quotes:
“We owe a lot to the Indians, who taught us how to
count, without which no worthwhile scientific
discovery could have been made. “
~ Albert Einstein
After the conversations about Indian philosophy, some of the ideas of Quantum Physics that had seemed so crazy suddenly made much more sense”.
W. Heisenberg (German Physicist, 1901-1976)
“The Vedanta and the Sankhya hold the key to the laws of mind and thought process which are co-related to the Quantum Field, i.e. the operation and distribution of particles at atomic and molecular levels.”
Prof. Brian David Josephson (1940 - ) Welsh physicist, the youngest Nobel Laureate
” It is India that gave us the ingenious method of expressing all numbers by ten symbols, each receiving a value of position as well as an absolute value, a profound and important idea which appears so simple to us now that we ignore its true merit. But its very simplicity, the great ease which it has lent to all computations, puts our arithmetic in the first rank of useful inventions, and we shall appreciate the grandeur of this achievement the more when we remember that it escaped the genius of Archimedes and Appollonius, two of the greatest men produced by antiquity.”
Pierre Simon de Laplace, French mathematician, philosopher, and astronomer,
Vedas(Old Sanskrit writings ) say that when SCIENCE ENDS SPIRITUALITY BEGINS!Most of the scientific conclusions now being put forth by some very acknowledged scientists were already mentioned by LORD KRISHNA in HIS SONG, the BHAGWAD GITA.
At the beginning of creation, Krishna spoke the knowledge of the Vedas, which guides souls on the journey of life and ultimately back to their spiritual home.
From time to time that knowledge becomes diluted or changed. To revive it, Krishna came to this world 5,000 years ago and spoke Bhagavad-gita to His friend Arjuna. The Gita contains detailed teachings on the supreme, infinite soul (God), the finite souls, karma (work in this world), time, and creation.
Bhagwad GITA was spoken by Krishna and written by Vyasadeva around 3100 BC, ie 3800 years before Mohammed and 2800 years before Jesus. Krishna was quite famous all around the world just like HIS previous avtaar RAM. It is said that the LORD(GOD-Mahavishnu) who has no ego no form but yet ever multiplying in forms comes to earth to save HIS own devotees(Good people - not any specific religion) from evil deors of Shaitaan and guide them to a satisfactory and ideal way of living. Everytime thus when Lord appears in his various AVTAARS on this stage of earth to play his own DRAMA, the uncanny and the unwise people on earth think of it as a new religion and caste and recoginise HIM just by few names. How thus people with such ego can understand GOD?
Each of us is one of the innumerable spiritual souls who emanate from Krishna.KRISHNA said to Arjuna before he revealed to him, the HOLY SONG OF GOD, ”O Arjuna, the preaching that I am going to give you today has been already spoken to Vivaswan(The Sun of our Galaxy), some 140 Yugas ago( 1 Yuga is 1,27000 human years)”. Krishna further said that our Sun Vivaswaan is not the only Sun. There are around 10,000 more suns in other galaxies. HE said that HE controls the whole Universe just by using 1% of HIS entire potential. There are millions of galaxies within HIM (which we all live in) and Millions of species all round the universe. He said firther that though there are other living entities, Humans are the most foremost creation made to “UNITE with GOD” . This human birth is attained after several births of pain and agaony and yes “Good merits”. And most of us loose this form after death because of our BAD ACTIONS in this birth.
Some people dont beleive in re-birth as their religion doesnt allow them to. But how then their religion allow them to beleive in Ghosts and Magical Genis? Its a matter of simple logic. Man tends to change everything GOD has created and taught…its our ego. But GOD forgives.
Krishna has mentioned how HE created the world. This explanation talliles exactly with the researches of the scientists.
“The Big Bang” - As explained by Lord Krishna…even before science came to existence!
Krishna Says:
The galaxies of this universe are all floating on a huge ocean (The Milky Ocean where LORD is SEATED). He emanualted HIMSELF as the four handed “NARAYANA”(Narah means the spiritual waters in Sanskrit and the physical position is termed as “Ayana” so “Narayana”). HE then created a seed(A big EGG) and as Narayana seated himself within the egg. He then divided the egg into two (Here the blast occurs) that is the “Heaven - Swarg or Jannat” and other “Hell - Nark or Jahhannum”. According to Lord Krishna there are 28000 Hells which souls are sent to repent for their past actions. There is one Swarg where humans go for their good merits enjoy for 100 years(which in uncalculable in human years- almost permanent for us) of Demigods (Devas, Adideva) and then come back to life in forms as per their merits. Some souls become angels or devas or farishtays some become humans. Similarly the turmour in hell is also not permanent and then souls come back as animals or pisachas. Then again htis life is counted for merits and the cycle continues.
Thus this prooved “Energy or Shakti” is Constant. Shakti is Lords own energy a female form of the Lord HIMSELF as lord has also explained how HE divided HIMSELF into female and male form and then created “Viraag” -(pain caused by seperation of these two entities “male and female”).
After creating these two halves Lord set to create other planets and galaxies. HE then expanded HIMSELF to three planary expansions “Brahma (to create planets, Vishnu(to pamper and manage the creation) Shiva)”
Planet of GOD:
Vaikuntha (or the ageless planet) is explained as the “Planet of GOD”. Once we become one with HIM leaving aside our egos and bad actions we move to higher planet of Krishna (Vaikuntha) where we are form and no form like GOD and have no age. Rivers flow under green gardens, sweet music played by Gandharvas or Cupids, Krishna says further that there are thousands of “Laxshmis” serving HIM.
“That supreme abode of Mine is not illumined by the sun or moon, nor by fire or electricity. Those who reach it never return to this material world.” –Sri Krishna, Bhagavad-gita 15.6
Can u imagine Krishna spoke about electricity 5000 years back!
What science agrees:
We can admittedly find nothing in physics or chemistry that has even a remote bearing on consciousness. Yet all of us know that there is such a thing as consciousness, simply because we have it ourselves. Hence consciousness must be part of nature, or, more generally, of reality, which means that, quite apart from the laws of physics and chemistry, as laid down in quantum theory, we must also consider laws of quite a different kind. —Niels Bohr, 1922 Nobel Laureate, Physics
Ordinary science cannot study spirit and its characteristic, consciousness, which are outside the purview of matter. Spirit can be studied through a spiritual science, such as that given in the Vedas.
Besides consciousness, other evidence suggests that our identity is separate from our bodies—for example, past-life memories and out-of-body experiences.
While God is infinite, we souls are small and are subordinate to Him. We exist to serve Him in love. Our intrinsic nature—our dharma—is to serve. That quality cannot be separated from us, just as heat cannot be separated from fire and sweetness cannot be separated from sugar. We will find full satisfaction only in re-discovering our unique service to God.
Lord Krishna says about:
Material Bodies
In the material world, we accept bodies different from ourselves. The Vedas tell us:
• there are 8,400,000 kinds of bodies born of the soul’s illusory desire to experience varieties of material enjoyment
• although we dwell within the body, Krishna is the body’s actual owner and controller; for example, He decides when we’ll leave it
• the elements of the body—skin, bones, blood, hair, etc.—are all repulsive on their own; we find the body attractive only because of the force of material illusion
• material bodies undergo six transformations: birth, growth, sustenance, production of by-products, dwindling, and death
• the body is a machine made of matter by which we, the soul, try unsuccessfully to find full satisfaction
• our actions in the human body determine what kind of body we’ll get next
Even after so many creations and dilusions, Lord Krishna says about what HE has to do:
“The Supreme Lord has nothing to do, and no one is found to be equal to or greater than Him, for everything is done naturally and systematically by His multifarious energies.”
KRISHNA belongs to ALL of us: Whats in the name?
Just as we may have different names according to our various roles—Mommy, Dr. Jones, Sweetheart, Professor, Your Honor—so does God. And since God is unlimited, He has innumerable names.The names can be generic terms, such as “God” or “the Absolute Truth.”They can be in Sanskrit, such as Govinda, Gopala, or Shyamasundara.They can be in other languages, such as Yahweh and Allah.
The name Krishna, which means “the all-attractive One, ” implies that each of us has an eternal relationship with God and we are always drawn either to Him directly or to His energies.
What is an Avtaar ?
People who have not learnt or read about this concept would be reluctant at the first time to acknowledge this from a normal human being.
But read what LORD HIMSELF Says. Before you read please close your eyes and think if you can really question the POWER OF GOD(KRISHNA, ALLAH, YEHWAH)?
Krishna expands into innumerable forms, each of whom is Krishna Himself. Being all-powerful He can expand Himself into forms with the same power and characteristics He possesses, without diminishing Himself in the least. Krishna is likened to the original candle that lights other candles of the same luminosity.
Krishna expands Himself to enjoy in a variety of ways through relationships with His innumerable devotees. Some of His expansions manage the material world, but Krishna in His original form remains aloof from the affairs of this world, ever enjoying with His associates in His spiritual land.
Krishna’s first expansion is Balarama, His elder brother in Goloka Vrindavan. From Balarama come all other expansions.
Although Krishna produces many forms identical to Himself, He remains one undivided entity.
Scientific explanation of expansion given by KRISHNA HIMSELF
Universal Management
To carry on work in the material sphere, Krishna expands Himself or incarnates. Each expansion or avatar possesses some of Krishna’s qualities in full. They appear with forms and emotions different from Krishna’s, and They carry out specific activities. They are uniquely named according to these characteristics.
Krishna creates the material world in response to our desire to try to enjoy outside of our relationship with Him. Everything here is created, sustained, and ultimately destroyed by His expansions.
Ultimately everyone reach Vaikuntha, “the place of no anxiety.”
Krishna’s Avatars
Krishna repeatedly comes to this world in various forms to perform specific functions. Such avatars distinguish themselves by performing extraordinary feats. They are known by references to them in the Vedas, including Srimad-Bhagavatam, which recounts histories of several prominent incarnations from the beginning of creation.
The islamic versionof KRISHNA’s coming is mentioned in Mehdi Moud a persian writing.
The ulltimate teacher is called a “Imam Mahdi” - who is a part of GOD HIMSELF
Below we see how the humble and most powerful LORD KRISHNA comes everytime in forms to help mankind:
Unlike normal human beings KRISHNA or GOD doesnt have any ego.
He comes every Yuga or Age to save mankind from expanding kingdom of Devil.
Incarnations
• come to show spiritual practices for a specific age in cyclical time
• come to give a glimpse of life in the spiritual world, and their actions become topics for discussion to liberate devotees
• come to create and control the material worlds
• take charge of the universe’s secondary creation (by Brahma), its maintenance (by Vishnu), and its destruction (by Siva)
Some points here to clarify to other religions that Hindus dont have 36000000 GODS.
Universal Managers
Some souls are invested with extraordinary power to manage the universe. They are known as devas or demigods. Although they display godlike powers, they are not God. They are finite souls empowered by God to act on His behalf. Unseen by us, they control, among other things, the forces of nature.
Knowing the Lord!
Krishna says that His opulence is unlimited and thus we can see Him everywhere, from the great cosmic laws to the buds of a flower. Here’s a sample of the many ways He suggests we can perceive His presence:
• I am the taste of water
• I am the light of the sun and moon
• I am the consciousness of living beings
• Of bodies of water I am the ocean
• Of sacrifices I am the chanting of the holy names
• Of immovable things I am the Himalayas
• Of weapons I am the thunderbolt
“I am the source of all spiritual and material worlds. Everything emanates from Me. The wise who perfectly know this engage in My devotional service and worship Me with all their hearts.”
The word “Brahman,” or simply “Brahma,” is used in a generic sense to mean spirit. God, the individual souls, and the spiritual effulgence of God are all referred to as Brahman (its Sanskrit root means “the greatest”).
When the word is used in the context of Brahman, Paramatma, and Bhagavan—the three phases of the Absolute Truth—it refers to the impersonal effulgence of God (Bhagavan). Brahman is also called the “brahma-jyoti”, or “spiritual light.” or “Noor Elahi” It is fills the spiritual world and, when transformed by God, becomes the primordial elements of the material world. Thus it is said to pervade everything.
“Whenever I have read any part of the Vedas, I have
felt that some unearthly and unknown light illuminated
me. In the great teaching of the Vedas, there is no
touch of sectarianism. It is of all ages, climbs, and
nationalities and is the royal road for the attainment
of the Great Knowledge.” ~ Thoreau (American Thinker)
By
Nitin Dakshene
This materialistic worldview has gained widespread acceptance not so much due to its scientific validation as due to its vigorous propagation. Moreover the impressive technological accomplishments of science – catering to the mass demands for instant relief and pleasure – have created among people a naïve, unquestioning faith that whatever science says must be true.
But as the harmful effects of technology are being increasingly recognized, so also are the fallacies of the scientific worldview that underlies these technologies.
More and more people – including acclaimed scientists – are realizing that reductionistic theories overlook a cardinal principle of science: theories should be based on objective evidences, no matter how unexpected, and not subjective beliefs, no matter how popular. The evidence uncovered by science – both at the macroscopic and the microscopic level – portrays a picture of the universe that is strikingly different from what most of us have been taught to believe as science.
Observation of the fine harmony of the universal laws, the amazing complexity and the purposeful, wonderful organization of animate and inanimate life on different levels, has started a progressively strengthening movement for the respiritualization of science.
This website is not anti-science, it is pro-humanity. Our human race deserves to know the truths about its origin and purpose and that is what this site will provide –by combining modern scientific research with timeless Vedic wisdom. The value and glory of Vedic wisdom has been recognized by many eminent thinkers. We give here just a few quotes:
“We owe a lot to the Indians, who taught us how to
count, without which no worthwhile scientific
discovery could have been made. “
~ Albert Einstein
After the conversations about Indian philosophy, some of the ideas of Quantum Physics that had seemed so crazy suddenly made much more sense”.
W. Heisenberg (German Physicist, 1901-1976)
“The Vedanta and the Sankhya hold the key to the laws of mind and thought process which are co-related to the Quantum Field, i.e. the operation and distribution of particles at atomic and molecular levels.”
Prof. Brian David Josephson (1940 - ) Welsh physicist, the youngest Nobel Laureate
” It is India that gave us the ingenious method of expressing all numbers by ten symbols, each receiving a value of position as well as an absolute value, a profound and important idea which appears so simple to us now that we ignore its true merit. But its very simplicity, the great ease which it has lent to all computations, puts our arithmetic in the first rank of useful inventions, and we shall appreciate the grandeur of this achievement the more when we remember that it escaped the genius of Archimedes and Appollonius, two of the greatest men produced by antiquity.”
Pierre Simon de Laplace, French mathematician, philosopher, and astronomer,
Vedas(Old Sanskrit writings ) say that when SCIENCE ENDS SPIRITUALITY BEGINS!Most of the scientific conclusions now being put forth by some very acknowledged scientists were already mentioned by LORD KRISHNA in HIS SONG, the BHAGWAD GITA.
At the beginning of creation, Krishna spoke the knowledge of the Vedas, which guides souls on the journey of life and ultimately back to their spiritual home.
From time to time that knowledge becomes diluted or changed. To revive it, Krishna came to this world 5,000 years ago and spoke Bhagavad-gita to His friend Arjuna. The Gita contains detailed teachings on the supreme, infinite soul (God), the finite souls, karma (work in this world), time, and creation.
Bhagwad GITA was spoken by Krishna and written by Vyasadeva around 3100 BC, ie 3800 years before Mohammed and 2800 years before Jesus. Krishna was quite famous all around the world just like HIS previous avtaar RAM. It is said that the LORD(GOD-Mahavishnu) who has no ego no form but yet ever multiplying in forms comes to earth to save HIS own devotees(Good people - not any specific religion) from evil deors of Shaitaan and guide them to a satisfactory and ideal way of living. Everytime thus when Lord appears in his various AVTAARS on this stage of earth to play his own DRAMA, the uncanny and the unwise people on earth think of it as a new religion and caste and recoginise HIM just by few names. How thus people with such ego can understand GOD?
Each of us is one of the innumerable spiritual souls who emanate from Krishna.KRISHNA said to Arjuna before he revealed to him, the HOLY SONG OF GOD, ”O Arjuna, the preaching that I am going to give you today has been already spoken to Vivaswan(The Sun of our Galaxy), some 140 Yugas ago( 1 Yuga is 1,27000 human years)”. Krishna further said that our Sun Vivaswaan is not the only Sun. There are around 10,000 more suns in other galaxies. HE said that HE controls the whole Universe just by using 1% of HIS entire potential. There are millions of galaxies within HIM (which we all live in) and Millions of species all round the universe. He said firther that though there are other living entities, Humans are the most foremost creation made to “UNITE with GOD” . This human birth is attained after several births of pain and agaony and yes “Good merits”. And most of us loose this form after death because of our BAD ACTIONS in this birth.
Some people dont beleive in re-birth as their religion doesnt allow them to. But how then their religion allow them to beleive in Ghosts and Magical Genis? Its a matter of simple logic. Man tends to change everything GOD has created and taught…its our ego. But GOD forgives.
Krishna has mentioned how HE created the world. This explanation talliles exactly with the researches of the scientists.
“The Big Bang” - As explained by Lord Krishna…even before science came to existence!
Krishna Says:
The galaxies of this universe are all floating on a huge ocean (The Milky Ocean where LORD is SEATED). He emanualted HIMSELF as the four handed “NARAYANA”(Narah means the spiritual waters in Sanskrit and the physical position is termed as “Ayana” so “Narayana”). HE then created a seed(A big EGG) and as Narayana seated himself within the egg. He then divided the egg into two (Here the blast occurs) that is the “Heaven - Swarg or Jannat” and other “Hell - Nark or Jahhannum”. According to Lord Krishna there are 28000 Hells which souls are sent to repent for their past actions. There is one Swarg where humans go for their good merits enjoy for 100 years(which in uncalculable in human years- almost permanent for us) of Demigods (Devas, Adideva) and then come back to life in forms as per their merits. Some souls become angels or devas or farishtays some become humans. Similarly the turmour in hell is also not permanent and then souls come back as animals or pisachas. Then again htis life is counted for merits and the cycle continues.
Thus this prooved “Energy or Shakti” is Constant. Shakti is Lords own energy a female form of the Lord HIMSELF as lord has also explained how HE divided HIMSELF into female and male form and then created “Viraag” -(pain caused by seperation of these two entities “male and female”).
After creating these two halves Lord set to create other planets and galaxies. HE then expanded HIMSELF to three planary expansions “Brahma (to create planets, Vishnu(to pamper and manage the creation) Shiva)”
Planet of GOD:
Vaikuntha (or the ageless planet) is explained as the “Planet of GOD”. Once we become one with HIM leaving aside our egos and bad actions we move to higher planet of Krishna (Vaikuntha) where we are form and no form like GOD and have no age. Rivers flow under green gardens, sweet music played by Gandharvas or Cupids, Krishna says further that there are thousands of “Laxshmis” serving HIM.
“That supreme abode of Mine is not illumined by the sun or moon, nor by fire or electricity. Those who reach it never return to this material world.” –Sri Krishna, Bhagavad-gita 15.6
Can u imagine Krishna spoke about electricity 5000 years back!
What science agrees:
We can admittedly find nothing in physics or chemistry that has even a remote bearing on consciousness. Yet all of us know that there is such a thing as consciousness, simply because we have it ourselves. Hence consciousness must be part of nature, or, more generally, of reality, which means that, quite apart from the laws of physics and chemistry, as laid down in quantum theory, we must also consider laws of quite a different kind. —Niels Bohr, 1922 Nobel Laureate, Physics
Ordinary science cannot study spirit and its characteristic, consciousness, which are outside the purview of matter. Spirit can be studied through a spiritual science, such as that given in the Vedas.
Besides consciousness, other evidence suggests that our identity is separate from our bodies—for example, past-life memories and out-of-body experiences.
While God is infinite, we souls are small and are subordinate to Him. We exist to serve Him in love. Our intrinsic nature—our dharma—is to serve. That quality cannot be separated from us, just as heat cannot be separated from fire and sweetness cannot be separated from sugar. We will find full satisfaction only in re-discovering our unique service to God.
Lord Krishna says about:
Material Bodies
In the material world, we accept bodies different from ourselves. The Vedas tell us:
• there are 8,400,000 kinds of bodies born of the soul’s illusory desire to experience varieties of material enjoyment
• although we dwell within the body, Krishna is the body’s actual owner and controller; for example, He decides when we’ll leave it
• the elements of the body—skin, bones, blood, hair, etc.—are all repulsive on their own; we find the body attractive only because of the force of material illusion
• material bodies undergo six transformations: birth, growth, sustenance, production of by-products, dwindling, and death
• the body is a machine made of matter by which we, the soul, try unsuccessfully to find full satisfaction
• our actions in the human body determine what kind of body we’ll get next
Even after so many creations and dilusions, Lord Krishna says about what HE has to do:
“The Supreme Lord has nothing to do, and no one is found to be equal to or greater than Him, for everything is done naturally and systematically by His multifarious energies.”
KRISHNA belongs to ALL of us: Whats in the name?
Just as we may have different names according to our various roles—Mommy, Dr. Jones, Sweetheart, Professor, Your Honor—so does God. And since God is unlimited, He has innumerable names.The names can be generic terms, such as “God” or “the Absolute Truth.”They can be in Sanskrit, such as Govinda, Gopala, or Shyamasundara.They can be in other languages, such as Yahweh and Allah.
The name Krishna, which means “the all-attractive One, ” implies that each of us has an eternal relationship with God and we are always drawn either to Him directly or to His energies.
What is an Avtaar ?
People who have not learnt or read about this concept would be reluctant at the first time to acknowledge this from a normal human being.
But read what LORD HIMSELF Says. Before you read please close your eyes and think if you can really question the POWER OF GOD(KRISHNA, ALLAH, YEHWAH)?
Krishna expands into innumerable forms, each of whom is Krishna Himself. Being all-powerful He can expand Himself into forms with the same power and characteristics He possesses, without diminishing Himself in the least. Krishna is likened to the original candle that lights other candles of the same luminosity.
Krishna expands Himself to enjoy in a variety of ways through relationships with His innumerable devotees. Some of His expansions manage the material world, but Krishna in His original form remains aloof from the affairs of this world, ever enjoying with His associates in His spiritual land.
Krishna’s first expansion is Balarama, His elder brother in Goloka Vrindavan. From Balarama come all other expansions.
Although Krishna produces many forms identical to Himself, He remains one undivided entity.
Scientific explanation of expansion given by KRISHNA HIMSELF
Universal Management
To carry on work in the material sphere, Krishna expands Himself or incarnates. Each expansion or avatar possesses some of Krishna’s qualities in full. They appear with forms and emotions different from Krishna’s, and They carry out specific activities. They are uniquely named according to these characteristics.
Krishna creates the material world in response to our desire to try to enjoy outside of our relationship with Him. Everything here is created, sustained, and ultimately destroyed by His expansions.
Ultimately everyone reach Vaikuntha, “the place of no anxiety.”
Krishna’s Avatars
Krishna repeatedly comes to this world in various forms to perform specific functions. Such avatars distinguish themselves by performing extraordinary feats. They are known by references to them in the Vedas, including Srimad-Bhagavatam, which recounts histories of several prominent incarnations from the beginning of creation.
The islamic versionof KRISHNA’s coming is mentioned in Mehdi Moud a persian writing.
The ulltimate teacher is called a “Imam Mahdi” - who is a part of GOD HIMSELF
Below we see how the humble and most powerful LORD KRISHNA comes everytime in forms to help mankind:
Unlike normal human beings KRISHNA or GOD doesnt have any ego.
He comes every Yuga or Age to save mankind from expanding kingdom of Devil.
Incarnations
• come to show spiritual practices for a specific age in cyclical time
• come to give a glimpse of life in the spiritual world, and their actions become topics for discussion to liberate devotees
• come to create and control the material worlds
• take charge of the universe’s secondary creation (by Brahma), its maintenance (by Vishnu), and its destruction (by Siva)
Some points here to clarify to other religions that Hindus dont have 36000000 GODS.
Universal Managers
Some souls are invested with extraordinary power to manage the universe. They are known as devas or demigods. Although they display godlike powers, they are not God. They are finite souls empowered by God to act on His behalf. Unseen by us, they control, among other things, the forces of nature.
Knowing the Lord!
Krishna says that His opulence is unlimited and thus we can see Him everywhere, from the great cosmic laws to the buds of a flower. Here’s a sample of the many ways He suggests we can perceive His presence:
• I am the taste of water
• I am the light of the sun and moon
• I am the consciousness of living beings
• Of bodies of water I am the ocean
• Of sacrifices I am the chanting of the holy names
• Of immovable things I am the Himalayas
• Of weapons I am the thunderbolt
“I am the source of all spiritual and material worlds. Everything emanates from Me. The wise who perfectly know this engage in My devotional service and worship Me with all their hearts.”
The word “Brahman,” or simply “Brahma,” is used in a generic sense to mean spirit. God, the individual souls, and the spiritual effulgence of God are all referred to as Brahman (its Sanskrit root means “the greatest”).
When the word is used in the context of Brahman, Paramatma, and Bhagavan—the three phases of the Absolute Truth—it refers to the impersonal effulgence of God (Bhagavan). Brahman is also called the “brahma-jyoti”, or “spiritual light.” or “Noor Elahi” It is fills the spiritual world and, when transformed by God, becomes the primordial elements of the material world. Thus it is said to pervade everything.
“Whenever I have read any part of the Vedas, I have
felt that some unearthly and unknown light illuminated
me. In the great teaching of the Vedas, there is no
touch of sectarianism. It is of all ages, climbs, and
nationalities and is the royal road for the attainment
of the Great Knowledge.” ~ Thoreau (American Thinker)
By
Nitin Dakshene
Sunday, April 17, 2011
OSHO Nitin Dakshene
OSHO Nitin Dakshene
OSHO Nitin Dakshene
OSHO Nitin Dakshene
OSHO Nitin Dakshene
OSHO Nitin Dakshene
OSHO Nitin Dakshene
OSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin Dakshenev
OSHO Nitin Dakshene
OSHO Nitin Dakshene
OSHO Nitin Dakshene
OSHO Nitin Dakshene
OSHO Nitin Dakshene
OSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin DaksheneOSHO Nitin Dakshenev
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)